contentdb/app/flatpages/help/wtfpl.md

43 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

title: WTFPL is a terrible license
no_h1: true
<div id="warning" class="alert alert-warning">
<span class="icon_message"></span>
Please reconsider the choice of WTFPL as a license.
<script src="/static/jquery.min.js"></script>
<script>
// @author rubenwardy
// @license magnet:?xt=urn:btih:1f739d935676111cfff4b4693e3816e664797050&dn=gpl-3.0.txt GPL-v3-or-Later
var params = new URLSearchParams(location.search);
var r = params.get("r");
if (r)
document.write("<a class='alert_right button' href='" + r + "'>Okay</a>");
else
$("#warning").hide();
</script>
</div>
# WTFPL is a terrible license
The use of WTFPL as a license is discouraged for multiple reasons.
* **No Warranty disclaimer:** This could open you up to being sued.<sup>[1]</sup>
* **Swearing:** This prevents settings like schools from using your content.
* **Not OSI Approved:** Same as public domain?
The Open Source Initiative chose not to approve the license as an open-source
license, saying:<sup>[3]</sup>
> It's no different from dedication to the public domain.
> Author has submitted license approval request author is free to make public domain dedication.
> Although he agrees with the recommendation, Mr. Michlmayr notes that public domain doesn't exist in Europe. Recommend: Reject.
## Sources
1. [WTFPL is harmful to software developers](https://cubicspot.blogspot.com/2017/04/wtfpl-is-harmful-to-software-developers.html)
2. [FSF](https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.en.html)
3. [OSI](https://opensource.org/minutes20090304)